About Us
How CRYPTO 100 Compares With Other Crypto Indexes
Not all crypto indexes are built the same. Some are designed to provide a simple market cap snapshot, while others are built for institutional investability, liquidity screens, or exchange-traded products. CRYPTO 100 takes a different approach by tracking the top 100 cryptoassets through a transparent rules based methodology that combines market capitalisation with the VALT Score, a framework based on volatility, adoption, liquidity, and tokenomics.
Comparing Leading Crypto Indexes
CRYPTO 100 Index vs Other Leading Crypto Index Benchmarks
As crypto markets mature, investors increasingly need clear, rules based benchmarks that go beyond headline price moves.
The CRYPTO 100 Index is designed to offer a broad view of the digital asset market, making it useful for tracking performance, comparing trends, and benchmarking exposure against other leading crypto indices such as CoinDesk 100, CoinMarketCap 100, Bitwise Crypto Indexes, S&P Cryptocurrency Indices, and Nasdaq CME Crypto Indexes.
What sets these benchmarks apart is not just the number of constituents, but also how they select assets, weight holdings, and rebalance over time. Some focus on the largest and most liquid tokens, while others emphasise broader market coverage, investability, or institutional-grade pricing, so the right benchmark depends on whether the goal is market representation, portfolio construction, or tradable reference pricing.
CRYPTO 100 Index vs Other Leading Crypto Index Benchmarks
CRYPTO 100 vs CMC100
CMC100 is designed to track the top 100 cryptoassets by market capitalisation. CRYPTO 100 (part of the Crypto Owl family of brands) also covers 100 cryptoassets, but uses the VALT Score to refine ranking and weighting through volatility, adoption, liquidity, and tokenomics rather than relying on size alone.
CMC100 is useful as a broad market snapshot. It shows how the largest part of the crypto market is performing using a straightforward market cap approach.
CRYPTO 100 is designed to go further. Instead of treating market cap as the full story, it combines size with a methodology led quality overlay. That means larger assets still matter, but they do not dominate.
It is built to reflect not just scale, but also structural quality across the top 100 cryptoassets.
Key differences:
• CMC100 is primarily a market cap benchmark.
• CRYPTO 100 combines market capitalisation with VALT scoring.
• CMC100 is designed as a broad market snapshot.
• CRYPTO 100 is designed as a quality adjusted benchmark.
FAQs:
What is the main difference between CRYPTO 100 and CMC100?
CMC100 is mainly driven by market cap, while CRYPTO 100 adjusts market cap exposure using the VALT Score.
Do both benchmarks cover 100 assets?
Yes. Both cover 100 cryptoassets, but they rank and weight them differently.
Why choose CRYPTO 100 over CMC100?
CRYPTO 100 is better suited to users who want a benchmark that considers adoption, liquidity, volatility, and tokenomics rather than size alone.
CRYPTO 100 vs Bitwise 10
Bitwise 10 is designed to track a smaller group of leading investable cryptoassets. CRYPTO 100 takes a broader approach by covering 100 cryptoassets and using VALT to improve the ranking and weighting process.
Bitwise 10 is built for concentrated large cap exposure. It is useful for users looking at the leading investable segment of the market in a simple and focused format.
CRYPTO 100 is designed for broader market intelligence. By covering 100 assets and using a rules based quality overlay, it offers a wider benchmark rather than a concentrated large cap view.
This makes CRYPTO 100 more useful for users who want to understand the crypto market more fully. It combines breadth with a methodology that aims to improve how assets are assessed.
Key differences:
• Bitwise 10 is concentrated around 10 large cryptoassets.
• CRYPTO 100 tracks 100 cryptoassets.
• Bitwise 10 focuses on investable large cap exposure.
• CRYPTO 100 focuses on broader quality adjusted benchmark construction.
FAQs:
Is Bitwise 10 broader than CRYPTO 100?
No. Bitwise 10 is a concentrated benchmark with 10 assets, while CRYPTO 100 covers 100 cryptoassets.
What does Bitwise 10 focus on?
Bitwise 10 focuses on large cap crypto exposure in a more concentrated format.
What does CRYPTO 100 focus on?
CRYPTO 100 focuses on broader top 100 benchmark construction using VALT to improve quality assessment.
CRYPTO 100 vs CoinDesk 20
CoinDesk 20 is designed as a liquid large-cap crypto benchmark. CRYPTO 100 takes a broader top 100 approach and uses VALT to add a more explicit quality overlay to market-cap ranking.
CoinDesk 20 is built around liquid, widely recognised digital assets. It is useful for users who want a benchmark focused on a smaller and more tradable segment of the market.
CRYPTO 100 is built for broader market understanding. By covering 100 cryptoassets and combining market cap with VALT, it offers a benchmark that reflects both scale and structural quality.
Key differences:
• CoinDesk 20 covers a smaller group of digital assets.
• CRYPTO 100 covers 100 cryptoassets.
• CoinDesk 20 focuses on liquid large cap exposure.
• CRYPTO 100 focuses on broader quality adjusted benchmark construction.
FAQs:
Is CoinDesk 20 more concentrated than CRYPTO 100?
Yes. CoinDesk 20 covers fewer assets, while CRYPTO 100 covers 100 cryptoassets.
What is CoinDesk 20 designed for?
CoinDesk 20 is designed as a liquid large cap crypto benchmark.
Why does CRYPTO 100 differ?
CRYPTO 100 uses VALT to add a clearer quality overlay across a broader top 100 universe.
CRYPTO 100 vs Nasdaq CME Crypto Index
The Nasdaq CME Crypto Index is designed as an institutional benchmark for the digital asset market. CRYPTO 100 is also designed as a benchmark, but it is more explicit in its methodology, combining market capitalisation with the VALT Score to refine index construction.
Nasdaq CME is aimed at benchmark infrastructure and broad market measurement. It is useful for users looking at crypto through a more institutional lens.
CRYPTO 100 is designed to be easier to interpret. Rather than simply presenting a benchmark result, it explains the ranking logic underneath the index through VALT.
This makes CRYPTO 100 more accessible for users who want to understand why assets rank where they do. It is a benchmark built not only to measure the market, but also to explain it.
Key differences:
• Nasdaq CME is positioned as an institutional benchmark.
• CRYPTO 100 is built as a transparent methodology led benchmark.
• Nasdaq CME focuses on market measurement.
• CRYPTO 100 focuses on quality adjusted ranking through VALT.
FAQs:
What is Nasdaq CME Crypto Index built for?
It is built to provide a benchmark for the digital asset market from an institutional perspective.
How is CRYPTO 100 different from Nasdaq CME?
CRYPTO 100 is more explicit about how assets are assessed, using VALT to combine market cap with volatility, adoption, liquidity, and tokenomics.
Is CRYPTO 100 still rules-based?
Yes. CRYPTO 100 is a rules based benchmark with a transparent methodology.
CRYPTO 100 vs CoinShares Top 10
CoinShares Top 10 is designed to track a concentrated group of large digital assets. CRYPTO 100 is broader and uses VALT to assess the top 100 cryptoassets through a more quality-adjusted methodology.
CoinShares Top 10 is built for concentrated exposure to major digital assets. It gives users a focused benchmark based on the largest part of the crypto market.
CRYPTO 100 is built to represent more of the market. Instead of limiting the benchmark to ten assets, it uses a top 100 universe and applies VALT to improve how assets are ranked and weighted.
For users who want a more complete view of the market, CRYPTO 100 offers greater breadth. It is designed to balance market scale with stronger underlying quality signals.
Key differences:
• CoinShares Top 10 focuses on a concentrated large-cap basket.
• CRYPTO 100 tracks 100 cryptoassets.
• CoinShares Top 10 is designed for concentration.
• CRYPTO 100 is designed for broader market representation with quality adjustment.
FAQs:
Why compare CRYPTO 100 with CoinShares Top 10?
Because CoinShares Top 10 is a concentrated large-cap benchmark, while CRYPTO 100 is a broader top-100 benchmark.
Does CoinShares Top 10 use a narrower universe?
Yes. It focuses on a smaller number of large digital assets.
What is CRYPTO 100’s advantage?
CRYPTO 100 combines broader market coverage with a methodology that uses VALT to improve ranking quality.
CRYPTO 100 vs 21Shares Crypto Basket
21Shares Crypto Basket products are designed to give users packaged exposure to selected cryptoassets. CRYPTO 100 differs because it is an independent benchmark methodology first, using VALT to refine ranking and weighting across a broader top 100 universe.
21Shares focuses on creating exchange traded access to crypto baskets. These products are useful for users looking at a packaged investment format rather than a benchmark methodology in its own right.
CRYPTO 100 is built around benchmark logic first. Its role is to create a more thoughtful framework for evaluating the top 100 cryptoassets, using VALT to add a quality overlay rather than simply packaging a smaller basket.
That makes CRYPTO 100 different in purpose. It is designed to help users understand the market more not just a basket of assets.
Key differences:
• 21Shares focuses on basket style crypto products.
• CRYPTO 100 focuses on benchmark construction.
• 21Shares is product wrapper led.
• CRYPTO 100 is methodology first, with VALT based ranking.
FAQs:
What is the main difference between CRYPTO 100 and 21Shares Crypto Basket?
21Shares focuses on packaged basket products, while CRYPTO 100 focuses on benchmark construction and methodology.
Does 21Shares have the same purpose as CRYPTO 100?
No. 21Shares is product led, while CRYPTO 100 is benchmark led.
Why is CRYPTO 100 different?
CRYPTO 100 uses VALT to refine how the top 100 cryptoassets are ranked and weighted, rather than simply wrapping a smaller basket into a product.